Response to TCFD Recommendations
Public Declaration of Support for Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosure
Basic Stance
The major social mission of the USS Group is to run auto auctions that minimize energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Work to limit the average global temperature rise benefits both the Group and society. It not only reduces risks arising due to climate change but also shapes a sustainable carbon-neutral society, which protects the environment for all life. Our public declaration of support for the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosure (TCFD) shapes the Group's approach to disclosures on governance, strategies, risk management, key performance indicators, and targets.
*The TCFD is an international initiative established by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) in 2015 to encourage companies to disclose information on the financial implications of the risks and opportunities that climate change presents to their businesses.
Information Disclosure Based on TCFD Recommendations
I. Governance
Oversight of the Board of Director
Key decisions regarding USS Group climate change issues, including transition plans (related to Governance, Strategy, Risk management, and Indicators and targets), are subject to resolution by the Board of Directors.
At least once a quarter, the Board of Directors receives a report from the President on efforts to address climate change-related issues and progress toward established goals, and monitors and supervises climate change issues. The Board of Directors makes decisions on matters deemed important by the President, such as management strategies, management plans, annual budgets, and profit targets, after considering the risks and opportunities of climate change as necessary.
Manager in charge of climate-related oversight
Matters related to climate change shall be overseen by the President. The President shall monitor and receive periodic reports on trends in emissions from each business and group company and on the progress of emissions reduction measures to achieve SBT targets, and shall be responsible for implementing the climate change issues set forth in the following items and shall provide direction for the environmental management activities of the USS Group.
(1) Conduct an assessment of the impact of climate change issues on the business (at least once a year)
(2) Develop policies and strategies to minimize identified risks and capture opportunities, and reflect them in plans, budgets, targets, etc.
(3) Development of transition plans with emission reduction targets as a pillar
(4) Establishment of KPIs on climate change issues and evaluation of progress, including review of KPI performance
(5) Reporting important matters related to climate change issues to the Board of Directors
II. Strategy
Identification and assessment of climate-related risks and opportunities
USS has identified, assessed, and prioritized climate-related transition and physical risks as well as opportunities. We have also created specific climate-related scenarios to gain even greater insight into these risks and opportunities.
Scenario analysis
USS identifies climate-related risks and opportunities with the potential to greatly impact not only our businesses but also our stakeholders. Two of our climate-related scenarios give us insight into future. The first is a low-carbon economy with a 1.5°C or lower scenario. The second is a business-as-usual scenario. Through the data (parameters) rooted in these scenarios and internal and external information, we assess the business and financial impact of climate-related risks and opportunities.
Scope: Auto Auction business and its entire supply chain
Target period: Now until 2050
Overview of scenario
1.5℃ Scenario | Business-as-Usual Scenario |
---|---|
1. Stronger laws and government regulations
Rapid emissions reductions toward carbon neutrality (EVs)Sharp increase in EV sales ratio (passenger cars) |
1. Delay in global EV adoptionGlobal
EV sales ratio (passenger cars) Approx. 4.5°C average temperature rise |
Reference Scenarios
・IEA NZE, IEA STEPS | IEA "World Energy Outlook 2023" (https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023) |
---|---|
・RCP 1.9, SSP1-1.9, RCP 8.5, SSP5-8.5 |
IPCC "AR5", "AR6" (https://www.env.go.jp/earth/ipcc/5th/)、 (https://www.env.go.jp/earth/ipcc/6th) |
Notes:
<Timing of occurrence>
Short term (S): Within 5 years; Medium term (M): 5 to 10 years; Long term (L): 10 to more than 30 years
<Possibility of Occurrence>
High (H): High potential; Medium (M): 50-50; Low (L): Low potential
<Financial Impact>
Small (S): ¥100 million or less; Medium (M): ¥100 to ¥5,000 million; Large (L): More than ¥5,000 million
<Definition of Significant Impact>
High potential and Medium(¥100 to ¥5,000 million) or Large(More than ¥5,000 million) Financial Impact
Risks and Opportunities
Type | Scenario Analysis Results | Timing | Possibility | Impact | Response Strategies | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5℃ Scenario | Transition Risk | Regulatory/legal changes | An increase in energy costs brought by the adoption of European-style carbon taxes and pricing even in Japan to achieve net-zero GHG emissions | S-M | H | M | Promote on-site adoption of renewable energy (solar power generation) Shift to CO2-free electricity, Utilization of non-fossil certificates |
|
A decline in auction sales due to lower demand for used gasoline car exports as more nations prohibit the sale of gasoline vehicles from Japan | S-M | M | L | Promote measures to increase the number of EVs in our auctions Expansion of business portfolio to continue creating schemes for fair and honest trade and resource recycling
|
||||
As the circular economy develops, sharing services will become more prevalent and fewer people will buy and own EVs. EV manufacturers will enclose EV distribution within their own supply chains. | S-M | M | L | |||||
Reputation | Investment behavior based on climate change risk and the movement to require SBT certification for investment will take root and expand. | S-M | H | M | Obtained SBT certification (Obtained SBT in October 2023) |
|||
Opportunity | Energy sources/Markets | Accelerating replacement demand from gasoline-powered vehicles to EVs for decarbonization, leading to an increase in the number of vehicles sold at our auctions | S-M | H | L | Promote measures to increase the number of EVs in our auctions
|
||
Products and services | An increase in the number of vehicles put on auction by developing the new inspection technologies and rules driven by industries working toward zero emissions | S-M | M | M | ||||
Business-as-Usual Scenario | Physical Risks | Physical Risks(Acute) | Suspension of business, additional costs to repair equipment, and higher insurance premiums due to damage of the auction house inflicted by typhoons or other natural disasters | M-L | L | M |
|
|
Physical Risks(Chronic) | Costs to rebuild or move the auction house on the coast due to damage caused by flooding and high tides resulting from rising sea levels | M-L | L | L | ||||
Higher average temperature and risk of heatstroke | M-L | H | S |
Impact Assessments and Response Strategies
1. Impact assessment of carbon tax introduction (Risk)
1-1) Increasing Businesses Costs Due to Carbon Taxes and Pricing
In order to achieve the Paris Agreement, Japan has made an international commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 46% by 2030 and to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, and in order to achieve these goals, "The Basic Policy for the Realization of GX" has been announced. In the policy, the introduction of a levy on carbon has been announced, and there is a possibility of expanding the scope of the levy and increasing the level of burden in the future.
1-2) Financial Impact
USS has calculated the potential financial impact of carbon taxes (carbon pricing). The 1.5°C Scenario has a potential financial impact of ¥350 million by 2030 and ¥620 million by 2050. The Business-as-Usual Scenario has a potential financial impact of ¥300 million by 2030 and ¥330 million by 2050.
<1>Important parameters (indicators) taking into account the financial impact in 2030 and 2050
Scenarios | 1.5℃ Scenario | Business-as-Usual Scenario |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | 2030 | 2050 | 2030 | 2050 | |
Without achieving GHG emission reduction targets | Carbon tax (billions of yen) |
3.5 | 6.2 | 3.0 | 3.3 |
When achieving GHG emission reduction targets | Carbon tax (billions of yen) |
2.0 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
Difference | Tax liability (billions of yen) |
1.5 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 1.4 |
Carbon tax and pricing (US$ per t-CO2) | 140 | 250 | 120 | 135 |
(Prerequisites)
The calculation presumes Japan will put in place a carbon tax with carbon pricing equivalent to nations committed to the IEA WEO 2023 NZE net-zero pledge as well as EU STEPS.
Conversion: Scope 1 & 2 Emissions for the Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2022 × Carbon Tax Price
Note: Currency converted at US$1 to ¥150
1-3) Response Strategy
Promoting Solar Power and Other Renewable Energy On-site
USS will employ several response strategies to address the potential impact of carbon taxes. These initiatives have been put in place to not only achieve our CO2 emission reduction targets but also promote on-site renewable energies. These efforts will mitigate our future tax burden. We will continue to devise plans with the highest benefit to the entire Group to achieve swift results.
<2>List of Solar Power Generation Facilities Installed
Phase | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ | Ⅴ | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Auction Site | R Nagoya | Nagoya | Shizuoka | JAA | Okayama | Saitama | Kobe | Yokohama | HAA Kobe |
Tokyo |
Operation start |
Jan 2023 |
Feb 2023 |
Jul 2023 |
Aug 2023 |
Oct 2023 |
Jan 2024 |
Mar 2024 |
FY2025 | FY2025 - |
FY2026 - |
2. Evaluation of effects of increasing EV sales worldwide (Risk, Opportunity)
2-1) USS forecast for the growth of EV utilization
If the use of car sharing services increases as part of measures to achieve a circular economy, there may be a decline in the number of people who own electric vehicles (EV). Another possibility is the decision of EV manufacturers to buy and sell these vehicles within their own supply chains. Either one of these events could reduce the number of vehicles consigned at USS auctions.
However, if various measures are implemented based on the goal set by the Japanese government in its "Green Growth Strategy Through Achieving Carbon Neutrality in 2050 "to achieve 100% electric vehicles in new passenger car sales by 2035, a large increase in new car sales (car replacement sales) will lead to a large increase in the number of cars auctioned at the USS auction which will likely have a significant positive impact on our earnings.
2-2) Strategic actions for combating climate change
A stronger framework for sales of EVs at auctions
The number of EVs at USS actions is certain to increase. USS is conducting R&D activities for determining EV evaluation standards, establishing an EV inspection system and other purposes.
To be specific, we became a member of Battery Association for Supply Chain, which is engaged in activities such as international standardization of the battery supply chain and construction of a battery ecosystem to realize a decarbonized society, and we are actively working with member companies to address issues such as battery diagnosis in the distribution of EVs through auctions.
More use of digital auction consignment forms
In anticipation of a large increase in the number of vehicles to be auctioned, USS is promoting the streamlining and digitization of its operations. Specifically, in the past, data entry was performed in-house at USS based on the seller's handwritten entry form, which required a large number of staff for the data entry process. The new system allows the seller's to create the entry form on the system, eliminating the need for data entry, improving the accuracy of data, and increasing operational efficiency. This digital auction consignment forms was introduced on a trial basis at the Nagoya in January 2021, and as of the end of March 2024, the system had been extended to all corners of the Nagoya, Tokyo, and HAA Kobe.
(Assumptions for these activities)
- The following reference data were used.
IEA Global EV Outlook 2023 (https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2023)
Global EV Data Explorer (https://www.iea.org/articles/global-ev-data-explorer) - For the 1.5˚C temperature increase scenario, calculations use the IEA NZE (net zero emission) scenario for determining the share of EV sales based on the premise that the total number of vehicles sold is the same as in IEA STEPS (Stated Policies Scenario).
- Figures for future years other than 2025 and 2030 are calculated using the assumption that changes will occur evenly across all years.
Transition Plan concerning Climate Change
The USS Group has established a Transition Plan (Roadmap) for measures to combat climate change. The implementation of this plan started in June 2023 following discussions and approval by the Board of Directors. To increase the accuracy of the transition plan, the road map that is the key element of the plan will be updated as necessary based on changes in the internal and external environment for the operations of the USS Group.
Furthermore, the Board of Directors will receive progress reports about the transition plan in order to allow the directors to supervise activities involving the plan properly.
Scope 1 + 2 emissions reductions
Two activities will be required for lowering GHG emissions that result directly from operations of the USS Group: energy conservation and the use of renewable energy.
For energy conservation, USS is promoting the introduction of high-efficiency energy-saving equipment for air conditioning, etc. For renewable energy, the USS Group is installing solar power facilities at its business sites because new sources of renewable energy contribute to progress involving the decarbonization of society. Solar panels are placed on the roofs of auction buildings and use power purchase agreements. As of March 2024, solar power generation has installed 7 auction sites out of all 19 auction sites. We will actively promote the installation of solar power generation equipment at the remaining auction sites.
Scope 3 emissions reduction
Approximately 95% of the GHG emissions across the USS Group's value chain are classified as Scope 3. Consequently, lowering these emissions will require the cooperation of a large number of stakeholders outside the group.
The GHG Protocol defines 15 categories of Scope 3 emissions. At the USS Group, emissions associated with the use of products sold, which is category 11, account for about half of all Scope 3 emissions. Furthermore, the share of emissions from products and services that are purchased, which is category 1, is about 30%. As a result, emission reduction measures will focus on these two categories.
The reduction of Scope 3 emissions is an important issue for the USS Group and society. Lowering these emissions will therefore require engagement with customers and suppliers. Activities have started for collecting emissions data from suppliers in some categories. There will also be educational activities and engagement campaigns accompanied by the sharing of information about various issues with customers and suppliers.
◆Transition plan (Roadmap) to achieve goals
III. Risk management
Framework to identify and evaluate climate-related risks and opportunities
As the manager in charge of climate-related matters, the president and representative director leads relevant departments and Group companies in identifying and understanding climate-related risks and opportunities. Our approach leverages a defined risk management framework to make headway. The president and representative director shares this progress with the Board of Directors at annual and extraordinary meetings. The Board of Directors uses these reports to monitor risk management progress as well as the initiatives and targets set to overcome various challenges.
Climate-related risk management framework
As the manager in charge of climate-related risks, the president and representative director reports and advocates initiatives to combat climate change to the Board of Directors. This includes the planning, proposal, and oversight of a risk management framework to identify, evaluate, and address its Group-wide impact. The Board of Directors has the duty to deliberate on and assess the overall risks presented by climate change using what has been learned from the reports and proposals presented by the president and representative director at these annual and extraordinary meetings. The Board of Directors will also create risk management policies and strategies to minimize risks from a Group-wide perspective. It will also properly incorporate those policies and strategies into plans, budgets, and targets.
IV. Indicators and targets
The USS Group has set a CO2 emissions reduction target equivalent to the SBT standard as a goal to be used in managing climate-related risks and opportunities, and has obtained SBT certification in October 2023
To achieve this goal, we have set a target for the ratio of electricity derived from renewable energy sources and are working to reduce GHG emissions by introducing on-site solar power generation equipment, switching to CO2-free electricity, and installing high-efficiency energy-saving equipment.
Items | Targets | Base year |
---|---|---|
Total emissions of Scope 1 and 2 | 42% reduction by FY3/31 | FY3/22 |
Scope 3 emissions | 25% reduction by FY3/31 | |
The ratio of electricity derived from renewable energy sources | 50% by FY3/31 | - |
GHG emissions
Electricity consumption & Ratio of electricity derived from renewable energy sources
Third-party Assurance
Independent Assurance Report
To enhance the reliability of the ESG data disclosed, CO2 Emissions data have obtained third-party assurance.
Other Data on Climate Change
CO2 Emissions throughout the Value Chain
Classification | Scope of calculation | CO2 emissions(t-CO2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | |||||
Emissions of the USS Group's business sites |
Direct emissions (Scope 1) |
Use of fossil fuels | 4,500 | 4,138 | 3,966 | 4,269 | ||
Indirect emissions (Scope 2) *Market-based |
Purchased electricity and heat use | 12,338 | 12,597 | 11,737 | 9,807 | |||
Total of Scopes 1 and 2 | 16,838 | 16,735 | 15,703 | 14,076 | ||||
Upstream and Downstream emissions |
Other indirect emissions (Scope 3) |
Category | 1 | Resource extraction, manufacturing and transportation related to purchased goods/services | 59,257 | 68,565 | 73,520 | 87,669 |
2 | Manufacturing and transportation of capital goods such as purchased equipment | 13,782 | 17,654 | 13,502 | 6,784 | |||
3 | Resource extraction, manufacturing and transportation related to purchased fuels/energy | 2,861 | 2,727 | 2,562 | 2,164 | |||
4 | Upstream transportation and distribution | 8,863 | 6,248 | 6,648 | 6,648 | |||
5 | Disposal of wastes discharged from business sites | 2,122 | 3,149 | 5,515 | 5,160 | |||
6 | Employee business travels | 147 | 166 | 146 | 147 | |||
7 | Employee commuting | 1,866 | 1,605 | 1,722 | 1,681 | |||
8 | Operation of assets leased to the USS Group | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | |||
9 | Downstream transportation and distribution | 3,752 | 2,838 | 3,531 | 3,679 | |||
10 | Processing of intermediate products | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | |||
11 | Use of sold products | 144,129 | 149,778 | 154,731 | 150,049 | |||
12 | End-of-life treatment of sold products | 2,051 | 1,609 | 1,370 | 1,520 | |||
13 | Operation of assets leased to other entities | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | |||
14 | Operation of franchises | 2,315 | 2,030 | 2,101 | 2,190 | |||
15 | Investments | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | |||
Total of Scope 3 | 241,146 | 256,369 | 265,347 | 267,692 | ||||
Total of Scopes 1, 2, and 3 | 257,984 | 273,104 | 281,050 | 281,767 | ||||
(Reference) Scope 2 Location-based | 12,458 | 11,933 | 11,732 | 12,129 |
*1. Scope: USS Co., Ltd. and all the group companies (100% coverage ratio to consolidated sales)
*2. Period: Fiscal year (April-March)
*3. Guidance: The GHG Protocol "Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard" & "Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard", Basic Guideline for calculating greenhouse gas emissions throughout the supply chain (ver. 2.6), IDEA v.2, etc.
*4. Database:
*5. Totals shown may differ from the simple sum of values shown due to rounding.
*6. CO2 emissions shown as "not applicable" correspond to zero.
Energy Usage
Boundary: All USS Group sites (100%).
Energy | Unit | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gasoline | kl | 582 | 585 | 564 | 605 |
Diesel Oil | kl | 743 | 617 | 572 | 621 |
Kerosene | kl | 107 | 79 | 80 | 111 |
LP Gas | t | 260 | 268 | 262 | 268 |
Natural Gas | Thousand Nm3 | 82 | 84 | 89 | 87 |
Electricity(Non-renewable energy) | MWh | 28,837 | 27,560 | 25,587 | 22,987 |
Electricity(Renewable energy) | MWh | - | - | 1,445 | 4,704 |
Total | MWh | 48,001 | 45,278 | 44,056 | 45,677 |
Evaluation of Energy Reduction Activities External Organizations
For the fifth consecutive year, starting in FY3/2017, USS was classified as an outstanding energy conservation company (class S) under the business classification system for energy conservation measures. The Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry assigns one of four classes (S, A, B, C) to all companies that submit periodic reports prescribed by the Energy Conservation Act. We will continue to use a broad range of energy conservation activities in order to retain our S rating. *URL for more information about this evaluation system https://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/en/